Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Dr. K's avatar

The fundamental problem here, in many ways, is the governmentization and corporatization of health care (using the word loosely). When doctors were in practice for themselves (I have been there) they were primarily concerned for and about their patients. It showed.

Now virtually all doctors are tools of large health care organizations, whether academic or private. They all answer to everyone EXCEPT the patient. The patient does not pay his or her own bills, so they really have no economic input into the transaction whatsoever either.

Those who pay the bills do not care whether patients sit on hold for hours. Makes no difference to their revenue streams. They just insert automation because it makes more money. What happens to patients is irrelevant.

The most egregious example of this is electronic medical records. Having practiced through both systems, I can vouch that in most ways, care was far better rendered using the paper chart and focused providers. It used to be that the nurses cared for the most needful patients while the aides did all the non-care work. Now aides provide almost all care while the nurses sit in the hallway punching data into Epic that not a soul will ever use/read except, perhaps, some lawyer, somewhere, sometime.

There is no money to be made in finding a home health helper for elderly patients who need them, so it is not happening. Those same people enriching themselves by forcing covid spikeshots on hundreds of millions of people that do not need them and never did are also enriched by the antineoplastic that extends a (miserable from side effects) life by two months. That's where the money will go.

Until there is a fundamental change in how health care is financed (and no, government paying for it all is not the solution -- Vinay should practice in Canada sometime like I have) this is not going to get any better and, in fact, can just be expected to get worse.

Expand full comment
Jim Ryser's avatar

So much said in so few words. I recently went to get inflixumab for late onset crohns and the sign in assumes one has a smartphone to open the camera to click on the square that takes you to the website login. Redundant and time wasting for me, I refuse to use it because part of the ritual of my own care is to INTERACT with Belinda, the wonderful woman behind the desk who dislikes the system as well. I like to get there, share words and a few pics of the grands, give a token of appreciation in the form of deer summer sausage from my hunt, and jabber for a minute or two. If connects the human component of reducing my own anxiety, and she likes the interaction with all of her patients (I’ve asked) as well. I was also in healthcare (chronic pain and addiction) and left the field entirely when it became profit driven. As a person who started as a patient (myelomeningocele and 57 subsequent surgeries) and one who tried for two decades to do what’s right for people, I’ve watched profit driven healthcare’s focus go from caring for the patient to caring for the bottom line. Isn’t the first order of caring for patients actually to CARE FOR THE PATIENT? I will keep the author and her family in my thoughts through the holidays and beyond.

Expand full comment
11 more comments...

No posts