Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jim Ryser's avatar

Thanks for the reminder about selection bias. Interesting to note that I’m an extremely compliant person with my recovery from addiction, in fact if I was that compliant with all of my chronic issues I’d probably be able to get off a few meds. Which is kinda my point. I noticed that when I got on a statin, I let my healthy diet go a bit “bc the statin will take care of it.” And lo and behold my A1C got wonky. Back to regular diet and much better again. Took some time! I noticed that, before my recovery, my coincidentally high LFT’s were bc of autoimmune hepatitis, not alcohol and too much Tylenol (Percocet - yep - I combined em like every good addict should). But once the AIH was managed and LFT’s went down, well you know what addict logic dictates! Fortunately the extreme excesses there gave me enough consequences to get help and recover from addiction, a day at a time.

Anyway, I think it’s extremely difficult to do true RCT’s and I applaud all of you who think through and ahead and remind us that although we strive for perfection with rigorous science, it’s never perfect. It’s as complex as each N=1 that we all are.

Expand full comment
Matt Perri's avatar

Nicely done. Elegant. Useful. Yet, I am always skeptical of large studies with very low p values. I can't help it. Blame it on my stat's professor. If only a longitudinal trial using this strategy had been started when we first noticed the link between statins and diabetes. Dr. Foy, great work. Glad to see you back.

Expand full comment
4 more comments...

No posts