You need to check your knowledge base, cause your statement that bacteria "are not deemed to be the cause of illness or infection" will get you laughed right out of the Mayo Clinic (maybe you've heard of that Institution):
"But bacteria may also cause illness. Many disease-causing bacteria make powerful chemicals called toxins that damage…
You need to check your knowledge base, cause your statement that bacteria "are not deemed to be the cause of illness or infection" will get you laughed right out of the Mayo Clinic (maybe you've heard of that Institution):
"But bacteria may also cause illness. Many disease-causing bacteria make powerful chemicals called toxins that damage cells and make you ill. Other bacteria can get into and damage tissues. Some infections caused by bacteria include:
Let me get this straight advocate of clown school. Bacteria that exist within the body can suddenly go rogue and cause problems unprompted? Ditto for virus (brainless and lifeless entities). Your saying the internal environment (nutrition, exposure to chemicals -household products -cosmetics and detergents, textiles, outdoor chemicals, insecticides, herbicides, whatever chems are falling from the sky, pollution, vitamins, drugs, stress-from living in a world full of all this shit) are not plausible possibilities causing disease and sickness? It’s the bacteria themselves?? You’re saying Bacteria arbitrarily migrate to areas of the body whereby the inflammation that results from their by-products leads to infection and sickness? It’s not the change in the internal environment drawing them to areas of the body in an effort to remove the toxins or poisoned tissues?
Becoming sick and experiencing symptoms, disease, is the process of the body attempting to eliminate the poisons. The strength of the individual and extent of the poisoning determines the duration of sickness. If not perturbed by more poison.
Sometimes the response can be to overwhelming for a weak body and one may succumb. But that does not mean bacteria was the cause of the sickness.
If you just stick with posting "blah, blah, blah, blah, blah" then you won't wear your fingertips out trying to convince everyone that the Mayo Clinic doesn't know anything about medicine.
Plus, you won't confirm your ignorance, laziness, and stupidity on a public forum!!!
Oh, and the two most common bacterium that cause infections are Staphylococcus aureus (staph) and Escherichia coli (E. coli) ... want to guess where they are commonly found???
Dys-biosis (sp?) might be part of what you’re staying. Strep does live within us and serves benefits,,,,,,,,,,,until it becomes out of whack/out of balance, potentially and or likely due to something changing (negatively) to the mammalian biome. Tough call I know. If you’re house suddenly goes up in flames, best to put it out first and later ask how’d the fire in the fireplace/kitchen/barbeque get so big.
You need to check your knowledge base, cause your statement that bacteria "are not deemed to be the cause of illness or infection" will get you laughed right out of the Mayo Clinic (maybe you've heard of that Institution):
"But bacteria may also cause illness. Many disease-causing bacteria make powerful chemicals called toxins that damage cells and make you ill. Other bacteria can get into and damage tissues. Some infections caused by bacteria include:
- Strep throat.
- Tuberculosis.
- Urinary tract infections.
Let me get this straight advocate of clown school. Bacteria that exist within the body can suddenly go rogue and cause problems unprompted? Ditto for virus (brainless and lifeless entities). Your saying the internal environment (nutrition, exposure to chemicals -household products -cosmetics and detergents, textiles, outdoor chemicals, insecticides, herbicides, whatever chems are falling from the sky, pollution, vitamins, drugs, stress-from living in a world full of all this shit) are not plausible possibilities causing disease and sickness? It’s the bacteria themselves?? You’re saying Bacteria arbitrarily migrate to areas of the body whereby the inflammation that results from their by-products leads to infection and sickness? It’s not the change in the internal environment drawing them to areas of the body in an effort to remove the toxins or poisoned tissues?
Becoming sick and experiencing symptoms, disease, is the process of the body attempting to eliminate the poisons. The strength of the individual and extent of the poisoning determines the duration of sickness. If not perturbed by more poison.
Sometimes the response can be to overwhelming for a weak body and one may succumb. But that does not mean bacteria was the cause of the sickness.
If you just stick with posting "blah, blah, blah, blah, blah" then you won't wear your fingertips out trying to convince everyone that the Mayo Clinic doesn't know anything about medicine.
Plus, you won't confirm your ignorance, laziness, and stupidity on a public forum!!!
Oh, and the two most common bacterium that cause infections are Staphylococcus aureus (staph) and Escherichia coli (E. coli) ... want to guess where they are commonly found???
Dys-biosis (sp?) might be part of what you’re staying. Strep does live within us and serves benefits,,,,,,,,,,,until it becomes out of whack/out of balance, potentially and or likely due to something changing (negatively) to the mammalian biome. Tough call I know. If you’re house suddenly goes up in flames, best to put it out first and later ask how’d the fire in the fireplace/kitchen/barbeque get so big.