Last week, I expanded on my nine pieces of “Advice for Internship.” As I noted, a little over a year ago I updated this list after an inpatient attending block during which I was reminded just how hard it is to be an intern. Part II is a bit less pithy, more parochial, but maybe more useful than Part I. The advice might be a bit internal medicine oriented, but I do think it is broadly applicable.
Be proactive
Interns are usually told: “Your job is to do, not think. You learn by doing. As the year goes on you will find yourself thinking more and more. Don’t worry about reading. You are going to be too tired to read. If you try to read, you will fall asleep and wake up anxious that you’re not learning.”
That is all true and pretty good advice. However, you can learn more while doing if your practice is deliberate. Deliberate practice during internship is probably even more important today than it was in the days before duty hour restrictions and admission caps. To force deliberate practice, concentrate on being proactive. This forces you to think for yourself.
Being proactive is not easy. Here are some tricks I have found that force doctors, from first month interns to grizzled attendings, to be proactive.
Ask yourself, Why did this patient get admitted? What led him or her to the hospital? What led another doctor to admit the patient? Remind yourself why the patient is in the hospital every day. Whatever else goes on in the hospital, this is a problem that needs to be addressed, if not solved, prior to discharge. Ask yourself what you are doing to solve the problem that led to (or have crept up since) admission.
Each day, create a series of if/then statements for the next day.
If his dyspnea is better, then I will change the furosemide from IV to PO.
If he is still having a fever then I will repeat the chest X-ray.
If her pain is not better then I will begin a PCA.
Gamify your learning
The best teachers make learning fun. Do this with patient care. It may seem impossibly nerdy but I love to predict lab results. Every day, you will make changes in a patient’s management. You will start and stop antibiotics. You will add a diuretic or an antihypertensive. You will transfuse packed red cells. Think about the effect of these interventions. Start easy. “I gave 2 unit of PRBC to this non-bleeding patient, how much will their hemoglobin rise?” Work up to more complex. “I added an ARB and a thiazide to this patient with heart failure who I have been diuresing with a loop diuretic. What will each value in his BMP and his calcium be tomorrow?”
Work on your differential diagnosis by being your own worst attending
Some attendings will grill you with questions. Most, these days, will not. Ask yourself the questions you need to be able to answer. Every differential diagnosis has a differential diagnosis. Make yourself work this to the 3rd order. If your patient presents with new onset atrial fibrillation, ask “why is she in afib?” If you determine it is from heart failure, what caused the heart failure? If the heart failure is ischemic, why does she have coronary disease?
Work on your clinical reasoning skills by being your own worst attending
Ask yourself the questions you least want to answer. There is almost no decision in medicine that cannot be questioned. For any test you order, what is the diagnostic hypothesis you are testing? Answering this question, you will protect you from suggesting an evaluation without a differential diagnosis.1 If a patient has abdominal pain and you think you need a CT scan, ask yourself, “what am I looking for?” This seems obvious but it is less and less common these days. This approach will also protect you from chasing down hundreds of incidental findings.
Ask yourself, “what is the pre-test probability of the disease I am testing for?” If it is 90%, do you need the test? If it is 90%, and the test is negative, what comes next?
Also, question every statement you make. Most of our pronouncements are uncertain. When you make a diagnosis, point out to yourself the weaknesses in your reasoning. What data have you discounted to make your diagnosis work? What other diagnoses – especially life threatening ones -- remain possible?
Don’t abandon your common sense (or work to acquire common sense if you don’t already have it).
What’s common is common. Common problems are more likely to present in uncommon ways than uncommon problems are to present in a textbook fashion. The law of parsimony exists for a reason. If someone gets sick a month after surgery, it is probably because of the surgery (Sutton’s Law).
You were accepted to medical school not only because you are smart but because you have a lot else to offer.
For the last four years you have had to put these traits aside while you (hopefully) immersed yourself in mastering medicine. Begin to nurture your unique (even idiosyncratic) qualities. Use your empathy, your humor, your skills of observation, your dedication to healthcare equity, your ability to function with little sleep, for the good of your patients.
A clinical reasoning sin on the “Diagnostic Reasoning Yellow Card.”
Photo Credit: Stacey Koenitz
During my internship an attending told us about a technique he frequently employed when giving a presentation in a conference. If your presentation includes x-rays or scans, always hang one upside down or backwards. There is always someone in the audience who is dying to make a comment and/or criticism. By getting that out of the way at the beginning one can often satisfy that need and allow you to complete the presentation without further interruption.
I did IM residency over 15 years ago at a respected California program known to be collegial and not malignant. Even then, Dr. Cifu’s wonderful principles, all which reflect a growth mindset, were not systemic. I have not been in academic medicine since, so I am curious if today’s programs reflect these principles?
Looking back I realize only a handful of the best attendings indirectly promoted them. The rest, their teaching styles highlighted those who had the most esoteric book smarts and embarrassed those who were (rightfully) struggling during the most challenging years of their lives. Dr. Prasad’s criticisms of current medical education seem to favor this style, concerned that today’s doctors are “weaker” and not learning critical thinking skills in a “woke” environment. I can’t see how this is true if principles similar to Dr. Cifu’s form the foundation of today’s programs.
My fear is they do not, and remain hidden, only to be experienced by chance when residents are assigned their teams.
If true, I’d argue THAT is the failure of medical education, not Dr. Prasad’s overweighted concerns about vaccine mandates and masking 2 year-olds.