What are we citizens to do? If our primary care doctor tells us they think the shots are safe, what recourse do we have? My wife is a medical professional and required to get the latest shots including the annual flu shot. This shit scares me. My son contracted SJS when he was 6. His pediatrician has advised him to avoid the flu vax and …
What are we citizens to do? If our primary care doctor tells us they think the shots are safe, what recourse do we have? My wife is a medical professional and required to get the latest shots including the annual flu shot. This shit scares me. My son contracted SJS when he was 6. His pediatrician has advised him to avoid the flu vax and the covid vax. Now an allergist was consulted and he says there should be minimal risk and he should be fine getting the vax. Well he wasn't in the PICU for 6 days with a severely sick child. He is now a healthy teenager and has had covid. It was mild and he recovered fine. Why does he need a jab?
Us lowly peasants need a direction to combat this political disaster that threatens our health.
I think Novavax COVID-19 Vacine is available, a more traditional protein vaccine, that is a controlled dose of the spike protein, which is not great, but could be far far better than an uncontrolled dose of the spike protein which it seems the mRNA technology may produce. But the medical industry is stearing away from Novavax.
natural immunity is far superior to the (original) dna-contaminated vaccines, which were at least subject to a double blind trial (cf Israeli study on this). Even in that trial, more subjects in the treatment group died than in the placebo group! Vaccination after infection is known to destroy natural immunity. As you may have noted, children have very little to fear from Covid. Google Ernesto Ramirez Jr.!
Other people need him to, so they won't be infected by him. It's part of being social. People who don't immunize (unless medically shouldn't) are selfish. I consider it GBH and if convicted serve detention.
There are no published studies that demonstrate mRNA vaccinated people are less likely to spread the virus. It's widely assumed because of experience with traditional vaccines. But mRNA vaccines are only designed to stop you from serious illness, not from spreading the virus. It would be a nice surprise if they actually slowed the spread. But it's plausible that they accelerate the spread. Here's why.
If mRNA works, the vaccinated people still catch COVID and will feel better. They might not notice they are infected. Might be more likely to walk around and infect others.
The vaccines are safe and we’d be far better off if everyone had gotten them.
A few people will have reactions. There is a national program to provide care for the people who do have reactions.
I’m so sorry your son’s life was endangered by SJS. Usually it’s possible to figure out what a patient reacted to. It’s great he saw an allergist; they should be able to advise. Very simply, the odds are much higher of being harmed by COVID than the vaccine. Beyond that, a vaccinated person sheds less virus, resulting in less transmission and less severe cases in our elderly and ill loved ones, less community spread, and fewer deaths. Vaccination results in fewer infections, weaker infections, and less long COVID.
What you are saying is true of traditional vaccines. If you have a study of mRNA vaccines that shows your assumptions to be correct, please share it. How about this. Just show me a study that shows deaths from all causes. And graphs it by vaccine status. Death and Vaccine Status are easy solid facts, so every honest health agency in the world has published this. We should see lower deaths in the vaccinated. Every honest health agency in the world has shared their anonymized data on death and vaccine status with researchers, obviously. Why not? And there is FOIA in many countries.
For some reason the only honest health agency I can find is the Czech Republic that responded to FOIA and published their anonymized data as required by law. Close your eyes, don't look behind the curtain! You might lose your job if you trust the science, rather than the Institutions of Science and their false consensus.
What are we citizens to do? If our primary care doctor tells us they think the shots are safe, what recourse do we have? My wife is a medical professional and required to get the latest shots including the annual flu shot. This shit scares me. My son contracted SJS when he was 6. His pediatrician has advised him to avoid the flu vax and the covid vax. Now an allergist was consulted and he says there should be minimal risk and he should be fine getting the vax. Well he wasn't in the PICU for 6 days with a severely sick child. He is now a healthy teenager and has had covid. It was mild and he recovered fine. Why does he need a jab?
Us lowly peasants need a direction to combat this political disaster that threatens our health.
I think Novavax COVID-19 Vacine is available, a more traditional protein vaccine, that is a controlled dose of the spike protein, which is not great, but could be far far better than an uncontrolled dose of the spike protein which it seems the mRNA technology may produce. But the medical industry is stearing away from Novavax.
natural immunity is far superior to the (original) dna-contaminated vaccines, which were at least subject to a double blind trial (cf Israeli study on this). Even in that trial, more subjects in the treatment group died than in the placebo group! Vaccination after infection is known to destroy natural immunity. As you may have noted, children have very little to fear from Covid. Google Ernesto Ramirez Jr.!
Here's why: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35370016/
Other people need him to, so they won't be infected by him. It's part of being social. People who don't immunize (unless medically shouldn't) are selfish. I consider it GBH and if convicted serve detention.
There are no published studies that demonstrate mRNA vaccinated people are less likely to spread the virus. It's widely assumed because of experience with traditional vaccines. But mRNA vaccines are only designed to stop you from serious illness, not from spreading the virus. It would be a nice surprise if they actually slowed the spread. But it's plausible that they accelerate the spread. Here's why.
If mRNA works, the vaccinated people still catch COVID and will feel better. They might not notice they are infected. Might be more likely to walk around and infect others.
The vaccines are safe and we’d be far better off if everyone had gotten them.
A few people will have reactions. There is a national program to provide care for the people who do have reactions.
I’m so sorry your son’s life was endangered by SJS. Usually it’s possible to figure out what a patient reacted to. It’s great he saw an allergist; they should be able to advise. Very simply, the odds are much higher of being harmed by COVID than the vaccine. Beyond that, a vaccinated person sheds less virus, resulting in less transmission and less severe cases in our elderly and ill loved ones, less community spread, and fewer deaths. Vaccination results in fewer infections, weaker infections, and less long COVID.
Informal and not official advice.
What you are saying is true of traditional vaccines. If you have a study of mRNA vaccines that shows your assumptions to be correct, please share it. How about this. Just show me a study that shows deaths from all causes. And graphs it by vaccine status. Death and Vaccine Status are easy solid facts, so every honest health agency in the world has published this. We should see lower deaths in the vaccinated. Every honest health agency in the world has shared their anonymized data on death and vaccine status with researchers, obviously. Why not? And there is FOIA in many countries.
For some reason the only honest health agency I can find is the Czech Republic that responded to FOIA and published their anonymized data as required by law. Close your eyes, don't look behind the curtain! You might lose your job if you trust the science, rather than the Institutions of Science and their false consensus.