Ultimately, anyone is able to not ingest nicotine. Eliminate it and its simply gone and not one person is worse off. "Harm reduction" is no solution, it's simply the enabling of continued toxic cultural paradigms.
Ultimately, anyone is able to not ingest nicotine. Eliminate it and its simply gone and not one person is worse off. "Harm reduction" is no solution, it's simply the enabling of continued toxic cultural paradigms.
Ultimately anyone is able to not ingest sugar, caffiene, alcohol, meat, and on and on and on. Anyone can not have sex..... Make procreation artificial insemination only. Why not just get rid of anything that causes any known harms?
Oh, I remember why, because no one wants to live in that world. A life worth living involves risk and known harms. If this harms less than that, have an open and honest conversation about it. Let all sites be heard and we can all make up our own minds. There is nothing more dangerous than a zealous do-gooder.
"Harm reduction" is a fallacy. It's propaganda for industry and cartels.
In Canada we took the wrong approach. This country is obsessed with virtue signal of "harm reduction", we pay for it through the nose, and it does not work, doesn't achieve what propagandists purport to achieve. It simply transfers profits and power from one industry to another.
Harm reduction is a loophole to save a few lives against the real problem, prohibition. Reportedly Canada is failing in multiple ways, so I don't believe that they are a decent example of any argument. Plus, I have not been there so I can't say one way or the other. I do know that in the US, there is no Constitutional or justifiable reason whatsoever for the criminalization and subsequent creation of this black market industry supplying substances people do by choice. Harm reduction is merely a way to save a few victims of prohibition from earlier death.
We simply need to end prohibition. We did for alcohol, why not for everything else. BTW, it took a Constitutional amendment to ban liquor. They have yet to enact one to ban the rest, therefor their laws criminalizing the rest should be repealed or judged unconstitutional.
Ultimately, anyone is able to not ingest nicotine. Eliminate it and its simply gone and not one person is worse off. "Harm reduction" is no solution, it's simply the enabling of continued toxic cultural paradigms.
Ultimately anyone is able to not ingest sugar, caffiene, alcohol, meat, and on and on and on. Anyone can not have sex..... Make procreation artificial insemination only. Why not just get rid of anything that causes any known harms?
Oh, I remember why, because no one wants to live in that world. A life worth living involves risk and known harms. If this harms less than that, have an open and honest conversation about it. Let all sites be heard and we can all make up our own minds. There is nothing more dangerous than a zealous do-gooder.
"Harm reduction" is a fallacy. It's propaganda for industry and cartels.
In Canada we took the wrong approach. This country is obsessed with virtue signal of "harm reduction", we pay for it through the nose, and it does not work, doesn't achieve what propagandists purport to achieve. It simply transfers profits and power from one industry to another.
Harm reduction is a loophole to save a few lives against the real problem, prohibition. Reportedly Canada is failing in multiple ways, so I don't believe that they are a decent example of any argument. Plus, I have not been there so I can't say one way or the other. I do know that in the US, there is no Constitutional or justifiable reason whatsoever for the criminalization and subsequent creation of this black market industry supplying substances people do by choice. Harm reduction is merely a way to save a few victims of prohibition from earlier death.
We simply need to end prohibition. We did for alcohol, why not for everything else. BTW, it took a Constitutional amendment to ban liquor. They have yet to enact one to ban the rest, therefor their laws criminalizing the rest should be repealed or judged unconstitutional.
This! Yes, end prohibition. Every time the govt goes the prohibition route, death ensues.