because you say that TACT 2 was under power, can you really correlate TACT 1 and TACT 2 because basically from what I understand they were not comparable.
Of course also this statement "If the treatment were a drug or lucrative procedure, Lamas’ presentation of a 41% reduction in major cardiac events in patients with diabetes would have b…
because you say that TACT 2 was under power, can you really correlate TACT 1 and TACT 2 because basically from what I understand they were not comparable.
Of course also this statement "If the treatment were a drug or lucrative procedure, Lamas’ presentation of a 41% reduction in major cardiac events in patients with diabetes would have been celebrated and likely sailed through FDA review"
Just like getting out in the sun and getting your vitamin D isn't going to make anybody money. No one's going to make any money, then they're not going to promote anything.
because you say that TACT 2 was under power, can you really correlate TACT 1 and TACT 2 because basically from what I understand they were not comparable.
Of course also this statement "If the treatment were a drug or lucrative procedure, Lamas’ presentation of a 41% reduction in major cardiac events in patients with diabetes would have been celebrated and likely sailed through FDA review"
Just like getting out in the sun and getting your vitamin D isn't going to make anybody money. No one's going to make any money, then they're not going to promote anything.