The challenge is VP has argued these points previously and others have argued against him. Yet VP does not engage those arguments, he keeps shadowboxing with strawmen. The worry is that SM is already that information silo and echo-chamber where you won't learn anything new because you'll only hear information you already agree with. How can that be improved?
The challenge is VP has argued these points previously and others have argued against him. Yet VP does not engage those arguments, he keeps shadowboxing with strawmen. The worry is that SM is already that information silo and echo-chamber where you won't learn anything new because you'll only hear information you already agree with. How can that be improved?
I don't fault him for not reading the comments. But the same arguments have been made in peer reviewed lit, some directly arguing against him. For that there's no excuse.
The challenge is VP has argued these points previously and others have argued against him. Yet VP does not engage those arguments, he keeps shadowboxing with strawmen. The worry is that SM is already that information silo and echo-chamber where you won't learn anything new because you'll only hear information you already agree with. How can that be improved?
VP NEVER reads these comments...ever. This goes back to his very first Substack post. It is really too bad.
I don't fault him for not reading the comments. But the same arguments have been made in peer reviewed lit, some directly arguing against him. For that there's no excuse.