For the love of God, I wish someone else would look at the data and do their own math. I deliberately made an elementary school style science project to present to our school board when they decided to mandate it on the kids.
Ok, the third thing they do. A Doctor gets his own funding, uses his own data, publishes a peer reviewed scientific study with findings that are contrary to the accepted narrative but can not be refuted. Now what?
Persecuting a Doctor and stripping them of their license for honestly revealing what the data show does not sound like the scientific method to me. That sounds like a corrupt system run by morally depraved individuals who should burn in hell.
If you actually read all this, thank you. Most sincerely.🙏🙏🙏
Important: I’m not telling you all this because I think you don’t already know. Obviously you do. What I’m trying to illustrate is, the problem is so bad that (me) a ski instructor can figure it out. And I suppose I do fault our society in general because we’re the ones sitting here accepting it. But I understand. I understand why individuals within the system comply and also why the general public does as well.
I’m pretty sure throwing data in the trash, changing the study design after it started to try to cook the data, or searching out “good data” before you start is not “science”. The CDC seems to have a habit of doing that but let’s move on. Now what if after they’ve collected the data, it shows the opposite of what they’re being paid to prove but they don’t want to do any of the above. What can they do? Well, you can write a title that says the opposite of what the data is showing and make sure you have an overwhelming list of PhDs signed on as authors so no one questions you. How the hell they come out with a study with data that shows the number of patients hospitalized during Delta (both with Delta and other diseases) were well over 90% vaccinated and then claim the opposite without getting busting is beyond me. Link coming in next comment.
https://substack.com/profile/117037158-athina-kaviris/note/c-39689708?r=1xoig6&utm_medium=ios&utm_source=notes-share-action
For the love of God, I wish someone else would look at the data and do their own math. I deliberately made an elementary school style science project to present to our school board when they decided to mandate it on the kids.
Ok, the third thing they do. A Doctor gets his own funding, uses his own data, publishes a peer reviewed scientific study with findings that are contrary to the accepted narrative but can not be refuted. Now what?
https://thehighwire.com/ark-videos/vaccine-study-costs-doctor-his-license/
Persecuting a Doctor and stripping them of their license for honestly revealing what the data show does not sound like the scientific method to me. That sounds like a corrupt system run by morally depraved individuals who should burn in hell.
If you actually read all this, thank you. Most sincerely.🙏🙏🙏
Important: I’m not telling you all this because I think you don’t already know. Obviously you do. What I’m trying to illustrate is, the problem is so bad that (me) a ski instructor can figure it out. And I suppose I do fault our society in general because we’re the ones sitting here accepting it. But I understand. I understand why individuals within the system comply and also why the general public does as well.
This is what I do about it.
I leave long comments.
Because I don’t know what else I can do.
https://youtu.be/qxr-cv-JuI8?si=MGRSDRWMUpYAEaWB
I’m pretty sure throwing data in the trash, changing the study design after it started to try to cook the data, or searching out “good data” before you start is not “science”. The CDC seems to have a habit of doing that but let’s move on. Now what if after they’ve collected the data, it shows the opposite of what they’re being paid to prove but they don’t want to do any of the above. What can they do? Well, you can write a title that says the opposite of what the data is showing and make sure you have an overwhelming list of PhDs signed on as authors so no one questions you. How the hell they come out with a study with data that shows the number of patients hospitalized during Delta (both with Delta and other diseases) were well over 90% vaccinated and then claim the opposite without getting busting is beyond me. Link coming in next comment.