Looking at the first graph in Fig. 7a of the study's supplement: What is causing the reduction in all-cause death at long periods (15-24 weeks)? This would seem to be spurious, as the expected result is 1. The short end is also below 1 for spurious reasons that were explained as "healthy vaccinees". So probably the whole graph should be …
Looking at the first graph in Fig. 7a of the study's supplement: What is causing the reduction in all-cause death at long periods (15-24 weeks)? This would seem to be spurious, as the expected result is 1. The short end is also below 1 for spurious reasons that were explained as "healthy vaccinees". So probably the whole graph should be shifted to the right by about 35% to eliminate those spurious effects. Then all-cause deaths would be seriously elevated at week 12, by 25% or so.
Edit: that comment was a little glib, as the benefit for the 24 week period would seem to represent real mortality. Nevertheless, 35% reduction in all cause mortality is a huge unexplained aspect of the data. Most other countries did not have much change in death rate among young people.
Looking at the first graph in Fig. 7a of the study's supplement: What is causing the reduction in all-cause death at long periods (15-24 weeks)? This would seem to be spurious, as the expected result is 1. The short end is also below 1 for spurious reasons that were explained as "healthy vaccinees". So probably the whole graph should be shifted to the right by about 35% to eliminate those spurious effects. Then all-cause deaths would be seriously elevated at week 12, by 25% or so.
Edit: that comment was a little glib, as the benefit for the 24 week period would seem to represent real mortality. Nevertheless, 35% reduction in all cause mortality is a huge unexplained aspect of the data. Most other countries did not have much change in death rate among young people.