Additionally, why am I not surprised to see Annals jumped on this bandwagon? You'd expect it from JAMA...even NEJM. But now, the ACP is getting in the "political science" ring, huh? Doesn't surprise me, as for two years now they've tried to convince me (with their "position" papers) I am a racist, homophobic physician with a penchant …
Additionally, why am I not surprised to see Annals jumped on this bandwagon? You'd expect it from JAMA...even NEJM. But now, the ACP is getting in the "political science" ring, huh? Doesn't surprise me, as for two years now they've tried to convince me (with their "position" papers) I am a racist, homophobic physician with a penchant for opposing women's "reproductive health". Funny...my growing patient population would tend to disagree. Speaking of my patient population, it exploded when people found out I wasn't pushing boosters. I'll take that hard evidence over Topol's obfuscated, self-congratulatory pseudo-science any day.
Additionally, why am I not surprised to see Annals jumped on this bandwagon? You'd expect it from JAMA...even NEJM. But now, the ACP is getting in the "political science" ring, huh? Doesn't surprise me, as for two years now they've tried to convince me (with their "position" papers) I am a racist, homophobic physician with a penchant for opposing women's "reproductive health". Funny...my growing patient population would tend to disagree. Speaking of my patient population, it exploded when people found out I wasn't pushing boosters. I'll take that hard evidence over Topol's obfuscated, self-congratulatory pseudo-science any day.