Tangential question: hypothetically, if the the study had met the secondary endpoint for all-cause mortality, how would your interpretation of the results change?
Generally, positive secondary endpoints are hypothesis generating, and not practice changing.
Would the same generality have applied to this study if the secondary endpoint of all-cause mortality had been met?
Tangential question: hypothetically, if the the study had met the secondary endpoint for all-cause mortality, how would your interpretation of the results change?
Generally, positive secondary endpoints are hypothesis generating, and not practice changing.
Would the same generality have applied to this study if the secondary endpoint of all-cause mortality had been met?
Tangential question: hypothetically, if the the study had met the secondary endpoint for all-cause mortality, how would your interpretation of the results change?
Generally, positive secondary endpoints are hypothesis generating, and not practice changing.
Would the same generality have applied to this study if the secondary endpoint of all-cause mortality had been met?