" a secondary analysis that was adjusted for the number of patients per resident physician as a potential confounder, intervention schedules were no longer associated with an increase in errors." Ya it appears the reduced hour "intervention schedule" was worse at sites without proper coverage. IE sites where they basically said due to re…
" a secondary analysis that was adjusted for the number of patients per resident physician as a potential confounder, intervention schedules were no longer associated with an increase in errors." Ya it appears the reduced hour "intervention schedule" was worse at sites without proper coverage. IE sites where they basically said due to reduced hours, you will see more patients and as a result more mistakes were made. We didn't need a study to come to this conclusion. Frankly it is obvious if you see more patients in less time you will make more mistakes. Truly programs need more staff.
" a secondary analysis that was adjusted for the number of patients per resident physician as a potential confounder, intervention schedules were no longer associated with an increase in errors." Ya it appears the reduced hour "intervention schedule" was worse at sites without proper coverage. IE sites where they basically said due to reduced hours, you will see more patients and as a result more mistakes were made. We didn't need a study to come to this conclusion. Frankly it is obvious if you see more patients in less time you will make more mistakes. Truly programs need more staff.