5 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
daniel corcos's avatar

"We so desperately need RCT data for our screening tests. "

Here, you have one:

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(85)92204-4/fulltext

Here's why it's best to detect early:

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaoncology/fullarticle/2474438

And here's why mammography screening has not reduced breast cancer mortality.

https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/238527v1.full

But you are not allowed to talk about that.

Expand full comment
Michael Plunkett's avatar

Is a 1985 study of breast cancer screening relevant in 2024?

Is a case- cohort useful for anything but hypothesis forming?

Expand full comment
daniel corcos's avatar

1) Yes, since the benefit of early detection has not changed.

https://www.bmj.com/content/381/bmj-2022-074684.long

Fig 4- 7.

2) This is not a case-cohort study. This is a specific retrospective study designed to address the hypothesis that excess cancers after mammography screening may be related to radiation.

Since we have no explanation for the failure of mammography screening to reduce breast cancer mortality and since mammography screening is ALWAYS associated with an excess of breast cancers, a single study (in the UK) where it is possible to analyze when these cancers occur is relevant. The fact that the same conclusion can be drawn from the effect of mammography screening in the USA and in France (Corcos & Bleyer, NEJM, 2020) removes all doubt on this subject. There have been NO studies since then to suggest that it could be otherwise.

Expand full comment
George's avatar

Pretty old stuff: RCT of mammograms in today’s world of better treatments needed

Expand full comment
daniel corcos's avatar

There is no reason to believe that better treatments have diminished the benefits of early detection (fig 4-7, https://www.bmj.com/content/381/bmj-2022-074684.long ).

Expand full comment