Why do you not mention AstraZeneca in the above narrative? After my second dose in May 2021, I began to have symptoms of what I now know is POTS. I am now being tested for Multiple Myeloma. I did complete the yellow card, and have not heard from anyone. I will not be receiving any more vaccines. Eve

Expand full comment

Is this another booster shot?

Expand full comment

So the rate of adverse events is 2-5 times higher than the estimated number of prevented hospitalizations? What a stunning success.....

Expand full comment
Jan 13, 2023·edited Jan 13, 2023

Most important of all is mortality in the "gold standard" RCTs. At 6 month follow-up in the Pfizer and Moderna RCTs, the vaccine groups had 4 extra non-COVID deaths for every 3 less COVID deaths overall (compared to the placebo groups), even during the deadliest Alpha wave in winter 2020-2021. The separate Pfizer and Moderna RCTs both had a 15-17% increase in non-COVID deaths, and specifically a 40-50% increase in cardiovascular-related deaths, with vaccine versus placebo.

Pfizer: https://www.nejm.org/doi/suppl/10.1056/NEJMoa2110345/suppl_file/nejmoa2110345_appendix.pdf – Table S4

Moderna: https://www.nejm.org/doi/suppl/10.1056/NEJMoa2113017/suppl_file/nejmoa2113017_appendix.pdf – Table S26

Believe it or not, the excess all-cause vaccine deaths in both RCTs were confined to the OLDER age groups. In the two RCTs combined, among the older age groups, there were 21 deaths in the vaccine groups versus 16 deaths in the placebo groups. A 31% INCREASE in mortality with the "lifesaving" vaccine. (Many reasons for the younger folks NOT to risk the vaccine, even if the 6-month mortality effect is mildly favorable for them, when it's ALREADY unfavorable for the older folks by 6 months).

Among the older age group (>65) in the Moderna RCT, there were 9 deaths in the vaccine group versus 6 deaths in the placebo group. https://www.nejm.org/doi/suppl/10.1056/NEJMoa2113017/suppl_file/nejmoa2113017_appendix.pdf - see page 53, Table S19

Among the older age group (>55) in the Pfizer RCT, there were 12 deaths in the vaccine group versus 10 deaths in the placebo group. https://www.fda.gov/media/152256/download - see page 57, BOTTOM of Table 25

Expand full comment

Within hours of my first Moderna vaccine in March, I developed severe tinnitus. Within two weeks of this shot, my heart "went crazy" for several weeks, but that eventually resolved on its own. It took me four months to work up the courage to get the second shot, and within two weeks of that shot, after feeling strange feelings in my ears, I went to the audiologist and discovered measurable hearing loss in one ear. I am afraid to get any boosters.

Expand full comment

You might want to update your HRT research: the 2021 publicity was a flawed interpretation of that data AND the HRT formulations have been completely changed (to bio-identical) and are indeed safe and in fact almost essential for health female aging.

Expand full comment

A TV doctor (cardiology) in the UK, Aseem Malhotra, reverses course on the safety profile of mRNA vaccines. He announced his publication of a study on the mRNA vaccines' safety in a press conference which was studiously ignored by the mainstream media. Is this more evidence that the media has been captured (bought) by pharma? Dr. Tess Lawrie, a prominent researcher, discusses.



Expand full comment

You don't have to be a scientist to understand this rap against the vax program:

"We believe that scientists have a responsibility to report suspected hazards to authorities. Consider a 1 in 800 risk of a serious adverse reaction [from the SARS-CoV-2 vaxxes] in the context of other vaccines. The 1976 swine flu vaccine was withdrawn after it was associated with Guillain-Barre Syndrome at a rate of approximately 1 in 100,000. In 1999, the rotavirus vaccine Rotashield was withdrawn following reports of intussusception in about 1 or 2 in 10,000."

Expand full comment

My intuition told me in the beginning something was very wrong about this. I was correct. I didn't need a background in science or medicine to know.

Expand full comment

"Why Do Doctors Push Dangerous Pharmaceuticals on Patients?"

In this doctor's practice and among his acquaintances,

1) a formerly sharp and physically health 90 yo woman develops Bell's Palsy one week following vaccination

2) a 69 yo man with a history of sarcoidosis, immediately following vaccination, develops dyspnea and rapid onset pneumonia, dying two weeks later

3) a 14 yo boy on the track team gets vaccinated, then 1-2 days later feels weak and sick to his stomach and was sent home assured by the ED staff that there was nothing wrong with him. Within a week, he could not walk, talk, nor swallow; GB Syndrome is suspected to be the cause. At least he can walk using a walker now

4) a 36 yo. man was diagnosed with GB Syndrome after vaccination because the employer mandated it

5) a long haul covid patient was vaccinated, with exacerbation of the LHC symptoms following...severe headaches, brain fog, severe back pain, sensitivity to light, exhaustion


Expand full comment

The jab can’t be taken back once given. Damage done. Careers and colleges can hold off until the data has been exposed to all via media. This requirement of the jab is so wrong. False emergency.

Expand full comment

If the CDC is trustworthy and competent, then why did the US have twice as many covid deaths as any other country?

Expand full comment

The only study I remember claiming that vaccinated were less likely to be hospitalized and die than the unvaccinated was from the CDC website. At that time their definition of "unvaccinated" included anyone who was less than 14 days past their second shot, and their definition of death due to Covid included all who tested positive at time of death.

Other studies have not shown evidence of severity protection.

Fully vaccinated (2 dose) individuals were twice as likely to be hospitalized and die compared with unvaccinated during the Omicron (B.1.1.529) variant surge in UK (Fig 5a-c). https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.06.28.22276926v1.full.pdf

Bayesian analysis of 145 countries show “a marked increase in both Covid-19 related cases and death due directly to a vaccine deployment”. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/356248984_Worldwide_Bayesian_Causal_Impact_Analysis_of_Vaccine_Administration_on_Deaths_and_Cases_Associated_with_COVID-19_A_BigData_Analysis_of_145_Countries

Vaccinated patients are 16X more likely to have moderate illness and 4X more likely to have severe illness upon reinfection with Covid than unvaccinated patients: Bangladesh data. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.12.26.21268408v1

Expand full comment

This was in an opinion piece in NYtimes today about the latest booster: And some writers and scientists have said the boosters should not have been offered until their specific human trials were complete. But there have already been extensive human trials for this vaccine and some of its updates, and it is not unusual to tweak a vaccine using data from sources like lab work or mice. That’s similar to what’s done every year for influenza vaccines.

Expand full comment

Have none of the researchers looked at the court ordered released Pfizer documents from the FDA? Naomi Wolf has put together a very large group of doctors, scientists, nurses, others in medicine to pour over every single page of these documents as they have been released. Her website DailyClout shares that information. This research group has access to those very same FDA Pfizer documents, the adverse experiences, the deaths, all of it is in there. Why is this not being looked at? It seems rather disingenuous that the research group is harping on “having access” to Pfizer’s documents. Where have you been these past months, they have been released since April 1st. So frustrating, this all seems very controlled to me, and not the work of true scientists who wish to seriously dig into the truths. All of you scientists who have bought into the whole CDC/NIAID narratives these past few years, need to do a huge bit of soul searching - as you come “late to the party” on the truths surrounding these harmful and toxic products. At this point, there should be a worldwide halt to distribution of any of these pharma products, and the harm they have done needs to be addressed. Maybe tap into those doctors who have been treating the jab harmed people and also those with long covid with multiple therapies that seem to be working: Dr. Pierre Kory, Dr. Paul Marik, Dr. Peter McCullough and others.. The medical and science community cancelled and maligned them as they were successfully treating patients through the C-19 as others all sat back and said “nothing we can do - head to the hospital if your Oxygen level drops to 90…”. What an absolute $hit show on medicine. They all forgot “First do no harm”. So rather than collaborate with doctors who are successfully treating their patients to wellness to have them share what they are using, the majority of doctors looked to the CDC to tell them what to do, and even more importantly what not to do. The medical community, outside of those who kept practicing medicine, has failed the people, they too got behind the CDC and their peddling/marketing of pushing the profits of Big Pharma. I am not sure that they (the broader medical community and medical “science”) can bounce back from this anytime soon, without some serious taking ownership of these past 2 years plus. Two words come to mind that greatly describe 2020 - 2022: Propaganda & Gas-Lighting

Expand full comment

The very fact that you need to justify carrying out an analysis that, by revealing adverse effects, might increase ‘hesitancy’ reveals the extent to which science and medicine have lost their way and become oppressive, wilfully blind, and dangerous.

If more information leads to more hesitancy in certain groups, so be it. That’s what informed consent & bodily autonomy are about. Those same things that doctors used to care about before they became the enforcement wing of the pharmaceutical industry.

That so many of your colleagues have lost sight of this - and you feel the need to justify what you’ve done - makes the medical establishment untrustworthy, and a danger to public health. How can we possibly trust a secretive, coercive establishment that claims to care about our health, but relies on concealment and bullying to prevent us making free choices? And sees at all nothing wrong with this?

Expand full comment