I am a lifetime subscriber of the New England Journal of Medicine. NEJM has embraced many editorial positions on abortion, gun violence as a public health issue, climate change, and for the Affordable Care Act. Despite the controversial positions, they have NEVER sought out contrary viewpoints for the sake of readers. The same is true fo…
I am a lifetime subscriber of the New England Journal of Medicine. NEJM has embraced many editorial positions on abortion, gun violence as a public health issue, climate change, and for the Affordable Care Act. Despite the controversial positions, they have NEVER sought out contrary viewpoints for the sake of readers. The same is true for Nature, once a universally respected journal. This is essentially a boycott against conservative viewpoints.
I am a lifetime subscriber of the New England Journal of Medicine. NEJM has embraced many editorial positions on abortion, gun violence as a public health issue, climate change, and for the Affordable Care Act. Despite the controversial positions, they have NEVER sought out contrary viewpoints for the sake of readers. The same is true for Nature, once a universally respected journal. This is essentially a boycott against conservative viewpoints.
They’ve been corrupted for a long time. Once ads for pharma start in journals I no longer trust them.
Yep NEJM has been corrupted to a narrative for decades.
And yet it does not occur to them that their bias does not in some way violate the scientific method!